Might 04, 2025 (MLN): After years of bleeding pink ink, shuttered vegetation, and dwindling investor hope, Pak Suzuki Motor Firm (PSMC) shocked the market with a outstanding turnaround. From a lack of over Rs10 billion in 2023, the automaker wiped the slate clear and parked a revenue of Rs25.23bn in 2024.

However simply as the corporate stepped into the inexperienced, minority shareholders discovered themselves proven the door by means of a swift delisting that, whereas dressed up as being “in their best interest,” felt extra like being left behind within the mud.

The corporate was delisted from the Pakistan Inventory Alternate at a valuation of Rs50 billion, roughly 2x its annual earnings. A P/E of two in a market the place even conservative valuations go larger? It begs the query: Was this a good deal, or had been minority shareholders shortchanged?

The velocity and timing of this delisting have raised quite a lot of eyebrows. A number of months earlier than this dramatic monetary restoration, PSMC proposed a delisting worth of Rs406 per share.

Quick ahead, and that supply jumped to Rs609 per share—a rise of almost 50% in a matter of weeks.

This delisting episode raised critical considerations concerning the robustness of regulatory oversight, which Mettis World had already highlighted in its earlier article.

What triggered this sudden generosity? And extra importantly, what modified so drastically in that brief span?

The reply could lie in what was stored behind closed doorways.

First Biogas-Powered Automotive Plant

The launch of Pakistan’s first biogas-powered automotive plant by PSMC is a serious strategic growth, one that’s sure to considerably scale back manufacturing prices.

However such a undertaking doesn’t materialise in a single day.

 The choice should have been within the pipeline for months, if not longer.

If the administration had foreseen this enhance to profitability whereas proposing delisting, but withheld this from the general public area, then we could also be watching a textbook case of insider info misuse.

There’s an elephant within the room that can’t be ignored: Was the corporate’s administration already conscious of the windfall that 2024 would carry once they initiated the delisting course of? And if that’s the case, why had been shareholders not knowledgeable of those transformative developments? Transparency, in spite of everything, is the cornerstone of fine governance.

This additionally places the function of the Delisting Committee and the SECP beneath the highlight. Why was the asset valuation technique used? Why was a 50% asset worth accepted as the premise when the corporate was turning into cash-rich? Was the committee satisfied?

On the coronary heart of the matter lie two key gamers: the valuator and the Voluntary Delisting Committee (VDC). Their dealing with of the method appears to have resulted in a valuation that many view as falling in need of pretty reflecting the corporate’s true value, which left minority shareholders with a minimal acceptable worth moderately than a genuinely honest one.

Citing a valuation carried out by Iqbal A. Nanjee & Co., initially, the corporate proposed Rs406 per share. Then got here the Voluntary Delisting Committee proposed the buyback fee to Rs609 per share, lacking the detailed rationale.

Allow us to not overlook that PSMC paid model royalties to its guardian value Rs4.2bn in 2022 alone, or 2% of web income, far above business norms.

The royalty-to-profit ratio averages an eye-watering 167% over a decade. The Suzuki model had worth, however shareholders weren’t being paid for it.

If that is what “protecting minority shareholders” appears like.

How can one overlook the episode involving Mian Nadeem Nisar and the resistance from different minority shareholders?

House owners representing 15.39% of the overall shareholding of PSMC collectively rejected the delisting of the corporate and the acquisition worth of Rs. 609/- per share. Therefore, they won’t be promoting their shares to the sponsors of PSMC.

In a letter written to MD PSX, Commissioner Securities and Alternate Fee of Pakistan (SECP), CEO of PSMC and Chairman Voluntary Delisting Committee (VDC), the shareholders drew consideration to clause 5.14.5 (a) of the Rule E book of PSX, which mandates that when the sponsors’ shareholding is under 90%, they’re obligated to extend their shareholding to no less than 90% of the overall shares to qualify for delisting.

It’s pertinent to notice that Investor Nadeem Nisar, who held greater than 10% shareholding in PSMC, formally contested the delisting worth of Pak Suzuki Motors shares, difficult its valuation and citing procedural irregularities.

In February 2024, he issued a letter to the PSX and SECP by which he expressed deep considerations relating to valuation discrepancies and procedural lapses within the delisting course of.

Nonetheless, after approval of PSX, the administration of PSMC commenced its share buy provide, efficient from February 22, 2024, till April 21, 2024.

Subsequent profitability and value discount plan unfolded by PSX and swift acceptance of fifty % enhance in purchase again worth was correlated and never a coincidence, and proof that minority shareholders’ apprehension had benefit, most likely ignored by the Regulators and Delisting Committee alike.

Reverse E book Constructing: The Honest Path, All the time Ignored

The PSX’s related regulatory authorities are urged to reevaluate the delisting course of and contemplate the adoption of a Reverse E book Constructing technique which is the one discussion board to make sure a good and simply end result for all stakeholders concerned.

It’s a mechanism that lets shareholders uncover the worth, as an alternative of counting on arbitrary values by valuators and regulators.

 In IPOs, shareholders are requested to pay premiums primarily based on promise and potential. However in delistings, they’re supplied peanuts primarily based on dated stability sheets and obscure outlooks.

If the corporate is sweet sufficient to make Rs25bn in revenue, it’s adequate to remain listed. Whether it is worthwhile sufficient for the guardian to need all of it, then it’s definitely value greater than Rs609/share.

Given the obvious gaps and the velocity with which the revised worth was accepted by the corporate, it’s solely honest that the CEO and board be known as upon to clarify the monetary assumptions and projections utilized in budgeting for the present yr, particularly in mild of this large deviation.

Justify It, Examine It, Compensate Minority Shareholders

The Delisting Committee ought to justify the sudden shift in valuation, the chosen methodology, and their rationale for approving the revised worth.

Additional, the SECP should provoke a third-party investigation to make sure that all developments and pricing choices had been made in good religion and full transparency.

Minority shareholders must be compensated accordingly, whether or not by means of a one-time dividend, a revised buyback worth, or an alternate profit-sharing mechanism.

To comb these considerations beneath the rug wouldn’t solely undermine investor confidence but in addition set a harmful precedent in our capital markets.

If firms can journey out years of losses with shareholder endurance after which quietly exit simply because the tide turns, what message does that ship to retail buyers and long-term holders?

Conclusion

As a way to regain the arrogance of minority shareholders, it could be acceptable that an unbiased investigation be carried out by SECP with regard to the valuation foundation and appropriateness of crucial info by the Firm.

Moreover, Mettis World strongly reiterate its earlier suggestion to instantly introduce the Reverse E book Constructing Rule to assist minority shareholders and bolster their confidence in PSX in addition to different stakeholders.

Copyright Mettis Hyperlink Information

 

Posted on: 2025-05-04T17:54:51+05:00